Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 09:37
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What’s next?
Little Benjamina, the oldest evidence of social empathy in humans - Earth.com
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
When British people write X after everything, are they being serious or trying not to be awkward?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ethane Exporter Says U.S. Won’t Allow Shipments to China - WSJ
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
More on Apple’s Trust-Eroding ‘F1 The Movie’ Wallet Ad - Daring Fireball
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Jessie J breast cancer: singer undergoes surgery after diagnosis - BBC
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
My ex got into a relationship within 2 weeks after a breakup. What should I do?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
How did Trump's ear recover 100% from the "two centimeter wound" we were told of two weeks ago?